In a world where traditional values seem to be under constant attack, two artists have caused outrage by creating dolls that mock the foundations of many people’s beliefs. Meet Emiliano Pool Paolini and Marianela Perelli, the creators of the so-called “Barbie: The Plastic Religion” collection, which includes dolls they have dubbed “Barbie Virgin Mary” and “Jesus Ken.”
These dolls, appearing in a toy shop in Buenos Aires Province, Argentina, have ignited a firestorm of criticism, with some even resorting to threats against the artists. But why all the anger? Well, it seems that Paolini and Perelli have chosen to use the revered images of religious figures, such as Catholic saints and representations of the Virgin Mary, to create their art. And as you can imagine, this has not gone down well with many devout followers.
The controversy started back in 2014 when the duo first exhibited their spiritual Barbies. However, it was the recent success of Greta Gerwig’s “Barbie” movie that spurred them to bring back their provocative collection. According to Pool, “Religion has always depicted virgins as the most beautiful women. Today, the most beautiful woman is Barbie.” But is that a fair comparison to make? For millions of believers, this is a clear mockery of sacred beliefs, and many are calling it blasphemous.
Local residents have not taken kindly to the display of these religious-themed dolls, and the artists have faced death threats from around the globe. While Paolini and Perelli maintain that their intention was not to offend, but rather to showcase their artistic expression, it is evident that their work has struck a raw nerve with many.
One has to wonder why the artists chose to use religious symbols for their project. Is it an attempt to garner attention and fame through controversy? Some critics have certainly suggested this, pointing out that the dolls are nothing more than a crass marketing ploy to ride the coattails of a blockbuster movie.
The dolls’ appearance in toy stores has sparked debate on social media, with some users calling it an “international scandal.” Others have questioned why other revered figures from different religions, such as Muhammad or Buddha, were not included in the collection. These are valid questions that Paolini and Perelli will need to address if they hope to be taken seriously as artists rather than mere provocateurs.
While artistic expression is an essential aspect of a free society, it must be done with respect and sensitivity, especially when dealing with matters of faith that hold deep significance for billions of people worldwide. It is clear that Paolini and Perelli have failed to strike that balance, and their work has been rightly met with skepticism and disdain.
In conclusion, the “Barbie Virgin Mary” and “Jesus Ken” dolls have thrust their creators into the spotlight, but not in the way they might have hoped. Instead of being celebrated as visionary artists, they find themselves facing the wrath of those whose beliefs they have trivialized. It is a reminder that with freedom of expression comes great responsibility, and that mocking deeply held religious convictions is unlikely to win hearts and minds.
