In a world where the Biden Administration and the green energy left relentlessly promote electric vehicles (EVs) as the saviors of our planet, a growing number of consumers are beginning to question the viability of this so-called green revolution. The narrative paints a picture of EVs as the ultimate solution to combat climate change, but what they conveniently overlook are the inconvenient truths lurking beneath the surface.

Championing EVs is all well and good until you delve into the harsh reality of their environmental footprint. It’s true that these vehicles may emit zero tailpipe emissions, but the production process involves mining precious materials, manufacturing, and charging them, all of which are heavily reliant on fossil fuels. So, the question remains: are we truly making an environmentally conscious choice when we switch to electric?

For consumers, the transition to EVs is fraught with obstacles that, unsurprisingly, translate to sky-high costs. The lack of charging infrastructure is a glaring issue. Finding a charging station can be an exercise in frustration, and when you finally locate one, the exorbitant costs associated with charging your vehicle can leave your wallet gasping for air.

Moreover, the initial purchase price of EVs is often out of reach for many hardworking Americans. These vehicles come with a hefty price tag and an equally hefty dose of unreliability. While manufacturers boast about their advertised range and performance, real-world experiences often fall far short of these lofty promises. As a result, potential buyers are left with a sense of disillusionment and a reluctance to make the switch.

The consequences of these challenges are evident in unsold EV inventory piling up on dealership lots across the nation. This bleak situation has prompted auto dealers to issue an open letter to the Biden Administration, pleading for more time to allow consumers to adapt to the idea of battery-powered vehicles. Whether this plea will influence the government’s push to mandate EVs remains uncertain, but it underscores the growing resistance among consumers.

But here’s the shocker: the woes of owning an EV don’t end with the purchase price and charging headaches. Recent data reveals that EVs can be significantly more expensive and time-consuming to repair after a collision. A Rivian owner learned this the hard way when a seemingly minor dent under their rear taillamp turned into a two-month ordeal costing a staggering $22,000. The advanced technology in EVs poses a unique challenge for repair shops, many of which lack the necessary expertise.

According to CCC Intelligent Solutions, a company specializing in insurance claims for auto repairs, the average repair cost for EVs last year was $6,587, compared to $4,125 for their gasoline-powered counterparts. Manufacturers may tout reduced maintenance needs, thanks to fewer moving parts, but collision repair is a different beast altogether.

These increased repair costs are also driving up insurance premiums for EV owners. Reports indicate that EV owners pay over a hundred dollars more per month in premiums than their gasoline-powered counterparts. Marc Fredman, chief strategy officer for CCC Intelligent Solutions, clarifies the misconception: “People are used to hearing that EVs have fewer parts than a combustion vehicle, but that is not the case in collision repair.” Additionally, EVs require specialized storage during collision repair, adding to the complexity and cost.

Looking ahead, there are no simple solutions in sight. Many repair shops may opt to avoid working on EVs altogether or charge a premium due to the heightened risk. As a result, consumers may find themselves paying even more to repair vehicles they already invested a small fortune in.

In conclusion, the road to electric vehicle adoption is fraught with challenges and hidden costs that cannot be ignored. While the green energy movement pushes for EVs as the future of transportation, it’s essential to take a closer look at the full picture. The promise of a greener world should not come at the expense of consumers’ financial well-being and peace of mind.