In a fiery critique, conservative commentator Megyn Kelly has taken CNN host Kaitlan Collins to task, exposing the glaring disconnect between Collins’ self-proclaimed objectivity and the reality of CNN’s bias. Kelly, known for her sharp insights and no-nonsense approach, didn’t mince words in her recent commentary.
Kelly’s scathing remarks came after Collins appeared on Bill Maher’s “Real Time,” defending CNN’s alleged impartiality in its reporting. According to Kelly, Collins’ defense of her network’s supposed neutrality is undermined not just by bias but by what she calls a “boring personality” that fails to resonate with viewers.
“The fact that Kaitlan Collins has roots in Alabama doesn’t magically make her a fair and balanced reporter,” Kelly declared. “Her biggest sin isn’t just the obvious bias—though that’s undeniable—it’s that she’s as dull as dishwater. I mean, seriously, does she think the audience will warm to her if she just looks perpetually sour?”
Kelly continued, offering a piece of unsolicited advice to the CNN host. “Here’s a pro-tip for Kaitlan: try smiling once in a while. It’s not hard. A little warmth could go a long way. Instead of being the ice queen of news, maybe show some human connection. You can be a tough interviewer and still have a bit of charm.”
Kelly’s comments highlight an ongoing critique of CNN’s credibility, especially after a recent appearance by Collins on Stephen Colbert’s late-night show, where her network’s claims of impartiality were met with incredulous laughter from the audience. The incident, reported initially by The American Tribune, showcased the disconnect between CNN’s self-image and public perception.
On “Real Time,” Maher pointedly questioned Collins about the skepticism surrounding CNN’s objectivity. “You were on Stephen Colbert’s show, and when he joked about CNN’s so-called unbiased reporting, the crowd burst into laughter. That’s a big red flag, don’t you think?” Maher asked.
Collins attempted to defend her network, insisting that her show provides a platform for balanced representation of both political sides. However, the situation took an awkward turn when Colbert made a quip about CNN’s objectivity, only for the audience to react with a loud, unplanned burst of laughter.
Colbert’s reaction was telling. “I know you guys are objective over there that you just report the news as it is,” he said, before being interrupted by the laughter. Collins and Colbert exchanged surprised looks, clearly caught off guard by the crowd’s response. “Was that supposed to be a laugh line?” Collins asked, to which Colbert replied, “It wasn’t supposed to be, but I guess it is.”
The moment underscored a growing sentiment that CNN’s claims of impartial journalism are increasingly viewed as disingenuous. As Kelly points out, the network’s attempts to project an image of neutrality ring hollow when juxtaposed with its on-air personalities’ performances and the public’s reaction.
In the end, Kelly’s critique is a reminder of the ongoing debate over media bias and the challenge of maintaining credibility in a highly polarized environment. For Collins and CNN, the road to restoring trust and credibility may require more than just a change in tactics—it might also need a genuine shift in tone and transparency.
