Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) delivered yet another unhinged performance on national television this week, using a CNN appearance to attack federal law enforcement and falsely brand an ICE agent a “murderer” — even as video evidence and official accounts directly contradict her claims.

Appearing on CNN’s *OutFront* with Erin Burnett, Omar doubled down on inflammatory rhetoric surrounding the Minneapolis shooting of left-wing activist Rennee Good, who was killed after allegedly attempting to run over an ICE officer during a chaotic confrontation. The officer, identified as Jonathan Ross, was reportedly hospitalized with internal bleeding after being struck by Good’s vehicle — a critical detail Democrats like Omar seem determined to ignore.

The facts of the case are straightforward. ICE agents were conducting an operation when Good refused to comply with orders to stop her vehicle. According to law enforcement and video footage later released, Good accelerated toward an agent, striking him and triggering a defensive response. Despite this, progressive politicians and activists immediately declared the shooting a “murder,” launching a familiar campaign to demonize police and federal officers doing their jobs.

Burnett confronted Omar with a statement from the White House responding to her earlier remarks, quoting officials who said video evidence “debunked” Omar’s claims and showed the ICE officer was clearly struck by Good’s car. The administration also accused Omar of lying about law enforcement and inciting further violence against officers — a charge that would give most public officials pause.

Not Omar.

Instead of reconsidering her position, the Minnesota congresswoman launched into a rambling, emotional tirade, dismissing the administration’s statement as “BS” and insisting, against all evidence, that the agent was never in danger.

“You see this officer clearly go in front of the car,” Omar claimed, asserting there was “no possibility” the agent could have feared being hit — despite video showing the officer making contact with the vehicle and later being treated for serious injuries.

Omar then escalated her rhetoric even further, accusing the Trump administration of engaging in a “PR defense of a clear murder,” and calling the shooting “unconscionable.” She insisted she stood by every word she had said.

Burnett, to her credit, pressed Omar on her repeated use of the word “murder,” giving her an opportunity to soften or clarify her statement. Omar refused.

“I am very comfortable with the word murder,” she said, claiming that anyone who watched the video would see a “clearly thought-out execution.”

That accusation — leveled without evidence and in direct contradiction to available footage — amounts to a reckless smear of a federal officer who was injured in the line of duty. Omar even went so far as to describe the shooting as an “execution,” accusing the agent of intentionally killing Good despite the rapidly unfolding, dangerous circumstances.

This is hardly new behavior for Omar, who has built her political brand on attacking law enforcement, vilifying immigration authorities, and siding reflexively with activists — no matter the facts. But her CNN appearance marked a new low, even by her standards: openly accusing an injured ICE agent of murder while dismissing video evidence as irrelevant.

At a time when law enforcement officers face growing hostility and violence, Omar’s comments are not just irresponsible — they’re dangerous. And once again, instead of condemning lawlessness, a member of Congress chose to inflame it.