In yet another blatant case of judicial overreach, Judge James Boasberg stepped in at the last minute to block President Trump from deporting illegal immigrants back to Venezuela. On March 15, 2025, Boasberg ordered a flight carrying deported individuals to be turned around, undermining the administration’s efforts to secure the border. Even more outrageously, the judge ruled that Trump could not invoke the Alien Enemies Act to override his decision—effectively siding with illegal immigrants over the American people.

The ruling immediately sparked a firestorm on social media, where conservatives called for the administration to ignore Boasberg’s interference. Many pointed out that a single judge should not have the power to undermine the will of the voters, who overwhelmingly backed Trump’s promise to secure the border and remove illegal aliens.

Congressman Brandon Gill (R-TX) wasted no time in responding to the activist judge’s obstruction. Taking to X (formerly Twitter), Gill announced his plan to file articles of impeachment against Boasberg, declaring:

“I’ll be filing Articles of Impeachment against activist judge James Boasberg this week.”

His post went viral, amassing thousands of shares and igniting passionate discussion. Conservatives rallied behind his call for action, with many demanding accountability for judges who continuously sabotage Trump’s America First agenda.

One user captured the sentiment perfectly, writing:

“Democrat judges are literally letting your children die and women get assaulted/trafficked because ‘muh orange man bad.’ Let that sink in.”

Another pointed out that this kind of judicial interference must be met with bold action, saying:

“With these judges, you have to do two things. 1) Ignore all their rulings. 2) Start investigations into these activist judges. I’m positive you will find corruption. Then you impeach them and make the Democrats vote to defend their criminality.”

Many conservatives expressed frustration that unelected judges feel emboldened to dictate immigration policy. One comment highlighted the absurdity of the situation, stating:

“Can someone tell me why a federal judge is blocking the will of We the People that gave President Trump a mandate by an overwhelming victory of winning the electoral college and the popular vote to fulfill his campaign promise that he would deport all illegal aliens?”

Another user took it even further, advocating for harsher consequences for judicial overreach:

“Don’t stop at impeachment. No more activist judges sabotaging the law. Impeach Boasberg, strip his pension, and prosecute.”

One historical analogy drew particular attention, noting that the timing of Boasberg’s ruling coincided with the Ides of March—a date famous for betrayal in history. The user wrote:

“Yesterday was the Ides of March. Trump has a choice. He can show leniency and forgive his enemies as Caesar did, and we know how that worked out, or he can use hard power like Caesar’s adopted nephew Augustus did. Augustus reshaped the courts. Our founders did not intend for there to be a permanent bureaucratic judicial leviathan.”

This comment resonated with many who believe that Trump must take decisive action against the deep state forces working against him.

The fight against judicial tyranny is far from over. Congressman Gill’s move to impeach Boasberg is an important first step, but it must be followed by serious reforms to prevent rogue judges from holding America’s immigration policy hostage.

One user summed up the stakes, writing:

“Great to see you taking a stand against judicial overreach, Congressman Gill. Judge Boasberg’s actions are a perfect example of why we need to drain the swamp and restore accountability in our institutions. Keep fighting for the American people and upholding the Constitution.”

With Trump back in charge, the American people are demanding action. The question now is whether Republicans will finally step up and put an end to the lawless interference of activist judges—or if they will allow the swamp to win again.