A two-day Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operation in southern Indiana resulted in at least 28 arrests, underscoring the Trump administration’s continued push to enforce federal immigration law despite growing resistance from activist groups and concerns voiced by some local organizations.

The enforcement effort took place Wednesday and Thursday in Clark County, Indiana, where federal agents conducted targeted operations that officials say led to the detention of dozens of individuals believed to be in the country illegally.

According to local reports, the Clarksville Police Department confirmed that ICE agents used its headquarters as a staging area during the operation, although local police did not participate directly in federal immigration enforcement beyond providing logistical support.

The increased federal presence quickly became noticeable throughout the community.

Several businesses that primarily serve Latino customers reported a sharp decline in foot traffic, while immigrant advocacy organizations said many clients canceled appointments because they feared leaving their homes.

One of the businesses most affected was El Mañanero Breakfast Spot, a restaurant in Clarksville popular within the local Hispanic community.

Owner Noe Muñoz said he decided to close the restaurant for a day because many regular customers were staying home following the ICE operation.

“I know there was a lot of fear yesterday and the day before with ICE,” Muñoz said. “My customers… they don’t want to go out.”

He claimed many residents believed immigration enforcement officers were stopping drivers throughout the area, although law enforcement officials had not confirmed those allegations.

Muñoz also expressed surprise at seeing officers from Corydon in Clarksville. Corydon is located more than 20 miles away and is reportedly the only police department in southern Indiana participating in a federal program that allows specially trained local officers to assist with certain immigration enforcement functions.

Residents also reported seeing a significant ICE presence near a local Home Depot, a location where day laborers have traditionally gathered in search of work.

By Friday, however, the increased law enforcement activity had largely subsided.

Muñoz said some familiar customers had still not returned.

“People ask, ‘Have you seen so-and-so?'” he explained. “Then somebody says, ‘No, they got deported,’ or, ‘They’re still being detained.'”

Immigrant advocacy organizations also reported disruptions to their daily operations.

Hispanic Connection of Southern Indiana, which has served immigrant families in the region for more than two decades, said numerous clients canceled appointments after hearing about the enforcement activity.

Organization President Lillian Rose said the group typically schedules appointments weeks in advance but has recently experienced an unusual number of cancellations.

“We normally have booked solid two or three weeks ahead,” Rose said. “In the last month or so, we’ve had lots of cancellations.”

According to Rose, many families told the organization they were reluctant to travel because they feared encountering immigration authorities.

The nonprofit is now considering expanding virtual and mobile services to continue assisting clients with ongoing immigration cases and legal paperwork.

“These processes continue,” Rose said. “They don’t care if ICE is out there.”

She noted that many immigration deadlines cannot simply be postponed because enforcement activity is taking place.

Supporters of the Trump administration’s immigration agenda, however, argue that the operation demonstrates federal authorities are carrying out the laws enacted by Congress.

They contend that while enforcement actions may temporarily disrupt communities where individuals living in the country illegally are concentrated, those consequences do not outweigh the government’s responsibility to uphold immigration law, maintain border security, and ensure that removal orders and federal statutes are enforced.

Conservatives have also argued that workplace operations and targeted enforcement efforts discourage illegal immigration by reinforcing that violations of immigration law carry consequences.

As the administration continues expanding immigration enforcement nationwide, operations like the one in Clark County are likely to remain politically divisive.

Supporters view them as necessary steps to restore the rule of law after years of lax enforcement, while critics argue they create fear within immigrant communities.

Regardless of where Americans stand on the issue, the Clark County operation serves as another reminder that immigration enforcement has once again become a central priority of the federal government—and that communities across the country are increasingly feeling the effects of that policy shift.