Former CIA Director John Brennan, a vocal critic of President Donald Trump, recently took to MSNBC to launch another attack on the Trump administration’s foreign policy. Known for his consistent opposition to Trump, Brennan’s latest rant highlights his belief that Trump’s “America First” approach is sowing global discord and alienating the nation’s allies.

Appearing on MSNBC’s *All In* on February 14, Brennan accused the Trump administration of using “arrogance” and “self-centered” tactics to push its own interests at the expense of America’s international partners. In typical neoconservative fashion, Brennan, who has a long history of promoting U.S. intervention abroad, seemed deeply upset by Trump’s departure from the traditional establishment approach to foreign relations. “The Trump administration is going to use whatever tool it can to intimidate, to threaten others,” Brennan claimed, continuing, “It’s coming across as very arrogant and self-centered.”

Brennan’s criticism was particularly sharp regarding Trump’s dealings with Ukraine. Despite the U.S. sending billions in aid to Ukraine amidst its ongoing conflict with Russia, Brennan suggested that the Trump administration was “shaking down” the Ukrainian government. While Brennan didn’t provide any concrete evidence of this supposed “shakedown,” his insinuation stands in stark contrast to the reality of the U.S. providing immense support to Ukraine. The claim raises questions about what Brennan considers a fair approach when it comes to foreign aid and U.S. involvement.

Furthermore, Brennan voiced frustration over Trump’s push for European allies to take more responsibility for their own security, rather than relying on the U.S. for protection. “I was in Europe earlier this week, and I must tell you that the frustration and anger with the United States has never been more palpable,” Brennan lamented. The underlying assumption is clear: Europe, particularly the European Union, should continue relying on the U.S. as a military and economic crutch, rather than stepping up on its own.

Brennan’s complaint about Trump’s foreign policy choices is rooted in a broader belief in America’s traditional role as the world’s policeman, a stance that Trump and his supporters have long rejected. Americans—especially Trump voters—strongly support the president’s strategy of encouraging other countries to carry their weight, rather than maintaining an open-ended commitment to defend them at great cost.

The former CIA director also expressed alarm over Trump’s stance on Palestine, claiming that Trump’s policies would “ignore” Palestinian self-determination and displace generations of Palestinians from their homeland. For Brennan, this represents a major deviation from the standard diplomatic approaches to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which he views as dangerously destabilizing.

Brennan concluded his segment with his most ominous warning yet, asserting that Trump’s foreign policy is “dangerous” and is creating “animosity” toward the United States. He argued that the growing resentment, both within Europe and the broader Middle East, would have long-lasting consequences. “That is not going to go away,” Brennan insisted, implying that Trump’s assertive, no-nonsense approach to diplomacy would irreparably damage the U.S.’s global standing.

What Brennan fails to recognize, however, is that Trump’s approach to foreign policy resonates with a large swath of Americans who are tired of being taken advantage of by foreign nations. They see his policies as a long-overdue reset, aimed at putting America’s interests first, and they are less concerned with the traditional “globalist” goals that Brennan and others like him champion. While Brennan wrings his hands over the shifting tides of U.S. foreign relations, many Americans are applauding the return to an America that prioritizes its own citizens over distant, often ungrateful, allies.