A federal bankruptcy judge has delivered a sharp rebuke to New York City’s brand-new far-left mayor, Zohran Mamdani, halting his early attempt to inject City Hall politics into a lawful private property sale—and sending a clear message that ideological crusades don’t override the rule of law.

Just weeks into his tenure, Mayor Mamdani tried to block the sale of thousands of rent-stabilized apartments owned by Pinnacle Group, one of the city’s largest landlords, after activist tenants complained about building conditions and raised fears about the prospective buyer, Summit Properties USA. Mamdani’s administration claimed the city had standing to interfere because Pinnacle allegedly owes New York City roughly $12 million in unpaid fines.

That argument didn’t hold up in court.

Bankruptcy Judge David Jones flatly rejected the mayor’s attempt to derail the transaction, dealing the administration a major legal defeat and clearing the way for approval of the sale—possibly within days. The ruling reinforces a basic but increasingly controversial principle in progressive-run cities: elected officials do not get to block private sales simply because they dislike the players or want to appease activist constituencies.

Despite the loss, Mamdani’s team is refusing to back down. Deputy Mayor for Housing Leila Bozorg vowed the city would “continue to fight” to ensure any future owner complies with housing codes and rent regulations—a statement that, critics argue, sounds more like a warning shot than a good-faith regulatory posture.

The courtroom loss comes as Mamdani’s housing agenda is already drawing intense scrutiny. According to Fox News, the mayor recently ignited backlash by appointing Cea Weaver to lead the city’s Office to Protect Tenants. Weaver has a history of radical rhetoric, including comments describing homeownership as a “weapon of white supremacy” and advocating for property to be treated as a “collective good”—language straight out of a socialist manifesto, not a city charter.

Though Weaver has since claimed to regret “some” of her past remarks—without specifying which—she doubled down on framing housing through a racial grievance lens, promising to address “systemic and racial inequalities” rather than focusing on pragmatic solutions to New York’s worsening housing crisis.

Critics argue this ideological approach is exactly what’s driving investment and stability out of the city.

Pinnacle Group, owned by billionaire Joel Wiener, owns roughly 140 buildings and 9,000 apartments across New York City. After the company filed for bankruptcy last year, Summit Real Estate Holdings offered approximately $450 million to purchase dozens of properties across Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, and Queens. That sale now hinges solely on Judge Jones’ final approval—not on political interference from City Hall.

Pinnacle’s attorney, Ken Fisher, underscored the stakes, warning that disrupting the bankruptcy process would undermine financial stability and essential services. “Completion of the bankruptcy auction process will bring financial stability along with the opportunity to stabilize services,” he said—outcomes any responsible city government should welcome.

Instead, Mamdani appears determined to govern by ideology, not law.

For property owners, investors, and everyday New Yorkers already battered by high taxes, crumbling infrastructure, and anti-business policies, the judge’s ruling offers a rare moment of clarity: even in progressive New York City, the courts may still serve as a check on radical overreach.

Whether Mayor Mamdani learns that lesson—or continues to wage war on private ownership—remains to be seen.