In a fiery exchange during a House Appropriations Committee hearing on Wednesday, FBI Director **Kash Patel** forcefully rebuked **Rep. Madeleine Dean** (D-PA) after she accused him of using his 2023 book, *Government Gangsters: The Deep State, the Truth, and the Battle for Our Democracy*, as a tool to target political figures. Patel’s sharp response not only challenged Dean’s unfounded accusations but also served as a powerful reminder of the deep political weaponization of government institutions that continues to undermine public trust.

Dean, notorious for her role as one of the impeachment managers during President Trump’s first impeachment trial, took issue with an appendix in Patel’s book that lists individuals who, according to Patel, have violated their constitutional duties. During the heated exchange, she claimed that the names in the book’s appendix were part of an “enemies list” being used by the FBI and the Trump administration to target political adversaries.

“I’m concerned about how many people from this blueprint have been targeted with executive orders and FBI investigations,” Dean said, attempting to tie Patel’s book to what she alleged was a coordinated effort to target political figures. She then provocatively asked, “When can I, a former impeachment manager, expect the FBI at my door?”

Patel, unfazed by the Democratic congresswoman’s accusation, delivered a masterful response. “Ma’am, you want to know who was targeted by a weaponized FBI? Me,” Patel retorted, firmly turning the tables on Dean. The FBI director continued with fire in his voice, “You want to know how and why? You want to know what I’m doing to fix it?”

However, Dean, eager to avoid further confrontation, attempted to change the subject. “Let me move on,” she said. But Patel wasn’t done, and he took the opportunity to address Dean’s baseless claims head-on.

“Well, you should read the book,” Patel snapped. “Because there’s no enemies list in that book. What’s in that appendix are the names of people who violated their constitutional obligations and duties to the American people. They were rightly called out—and you should give that book to every one of your constituents so they can read about it.”

Dean, clearly uncomfortable with the response, dismissed Patel’s challenge. “That’s their loss,” Patel shot back, underscoring the value of transparency and truth in exposing the bureaucratic corruption that has plagued Washington for years.

This exchange highlights the ongoing frustrations many conservatives feel about the weaponization of government agencies, particularly the FBI, against political adversaries. The tension between Patel and Dean represents a larger narrative: the use of government power to target political opponents under the guise of law enforcement.

Patel, who has experienced the brunt of these politically motivated investigations, was also subpoenaed and compelled to testify before a federal grand jury as part of former special counsel **Jack Smith’s** investigation into Trump’s handling of documents after his presidency. Many conservatives argue that the case, in which criminal charges against Trump were dismissed last July, was nothing more than a politically charged attempt to undermine the Trump administration and silence his supporters.

As FBI Director, Patel’s commitment to rooting out corruption within the agency has made him a target for left-wing politicians like Dean. But his unwavering defense of constitutional rights and his blunt challenge to the status quo has earned him the admiration of many who are tired of seeing American institutions bent to serve political agendas.

This heated exchange is a clear reminder that, under Patel’s leadership, the FBI may finally be on the path to restoring its credibility and serving the American people, rather than becoming an instrument of partisan warfare. While Dean and others on the left continue to push their narrative, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to ignore the fact that the real threat to democracy comes from those who seek to manipulate the system for political gain.