In a bold move that has captured national attention, the Boise State women’s volleyball team has made headlines for their refusal to compete against San Jose State this past weekend. The reason? San Jose State’s roster includes a transgender player—a biological male. Rather than compromise the integrity of their sport, the Broncos opted to forfeit the match, standing firmly by their principles.
In an official statement, Boise State Athletics declared, “Boise State volleyball will not play its scheduled match at San José State on Saturday, Sept. 28. Per Mountain West Conference policy, the Conference will record the match as a forfeit and a loss for Boise State.” The team’s commitment to fairness in sports was further underscored as they prepared to resume their season against Air Force on October 3.
Outkick Sports founder David Hookstead reported that the players received strong backing from their school, coaches, and parents. “Boise State women’s volleyball announces it will not play San Jose State because the team’s best player is a male,” he stated. This sentiment has been echoed across social media, where users have applauded the team for their bravery in taking a stand against the growing trend of allowing biological males to compete in women’s sports.
One supporter noted, “These women deserve to be applauded. It was a team decision to not play against a male dominating everyone else, and they made the decision knowing some people would attack them for it. Next two games are at home. I have a feeling it will be packed attendance!” This response demonstrates a broader movement among athletes and fans who believe in maintaining a level playing field for women in sports.
The outrage over transgender inclusion in women’s sports is not merely a conversation among athletes; it is a pressing issue that resonates with many concerned about fairness and safety. One Twitter user succinctly captured the sentiment: “Stand with Boise State for not caving to the woke nonsense of men playing in women’s sports. It’s not only highly unfair. It’s dangerous.” The implications of allowing biological males to compete against women extend beyond individual games—they affect the future of women’s sports.
Another comment emphasized the risk these young female athletes took in making such a decision: “Having the school back them is HUGE. For those who don’t know, women’s volleyball is one of the few sports that is a ‘headcount’ sport and players get 100% ride. Big risk for girls to stand up and put that full ride on the line if the school didn’t back them.” This support is crucial, as it empowers these athletes to prioritize fairness over potential backlash.
Critics of transgender participation in women’s sports have been vocal, arguing that it undermines the achievements and opportunities of biological females. “Biological women in sports should never have to tolerate biological men in their sports,” one user wrote. “It’s time to end the lunacy.” Such comments reflect a growing frustration with the erosion of traditional gender norms and the pushback against policies perceived as unjust.
In light of this situation, many are calling for a reevaluation of how sports categorize athletes, proposing alternative classifications that recognize biological differences. “The former men’s team should be the ‘Premier’ team, where anyone can play if they make the team,” suggested one commentator. “And the former women’s team is now the ‘XX Chromosome’ team, where our daughters can compete.”
Boise State’s decision to forfeit the match against San Jose State represents more than just a game; it’s a critical stand for the rights of women athletes everywhere. As the debate over gender and sports continues to escalate, the Broncos have proven that they are willing to prioritize fairness and integrity, even in the face of intense pressure.
